Faktor Pemilihan Moda Kereta Api Bandar Udara Dalam Mendukung Aksesibilitas Menuju Ibu Kota Nusantara
G. W. Anesyawati1*, M. Z. Irawan1, Imam Muthohar1
1Departemen Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, INDONESIA
*Corresponding author: zudhyirawan@ugm.ac.id
INTISARI
Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara dan selanjutnya disebut Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) membawa dampak besar terhadap pola perjalanan dinas Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) instansi pusat. Sangat penting untuk mengetahui faktor yang dapat menunjang keberhasilan implementasi moda tersebut yaitu dengan mengetahui faktor psikologis yang memiliki daya prediktif kuat sebagai pendukung atribut sosial ekonomi. Penelitian ini mengacu tiga teori utama, yaitu Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), dan Goal-Framing Theory (GFT) serta menambahkan variabel kepercayaan (trust). Analisis dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) berbasis Partial Least Squares (PLS) dengan bantuan perangkat lunak SmartPLS. Hasil temuan menunjukkan faktor psikologis yang memengaruhi ialah trust, perceived ease of use, instrumental attitude, self efficacy, eudaimonic value, dan normative value. Implikasi kebijakan yang dihasilkan mencakup 1) Perceived ease of use meliputi meningkatkan UI/UX, meningkatkan kecepatan dan keandalan aplikasi, meningkatkan kemudahan dalam transaksi; 2) Instrumental attitude meliputi mengintegrasikan KA Bandara IKN dengan bandara secara efektif; 3) Self-efficacy dengan menyediakan perjalanan yang nyaman dan aman; 4) Normative value dengan memberikan informasi dengan memperjelas dampak positif yang diberikan pada lingkungan; 5) Eudaimonic value dengan menumbuhkan perasaan yang bermakna dan berarti terhadap penggunaan KA Bandara IKN.
REFERENSI
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Brög, W., Erl, E., Ker, I., Ryle, J., & Wall, R. (2009). Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences
from three continents. Transport Policy, 16(6), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.003
Chou, C. C., Iamtrakul, P., Yoh, K., Miyata, M., & Doi, K. (2024). Determining the role of self-efficacy in sustained
behavior change: An empirical study on intention to use community-based electric ride-sharing. Transportation
Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 179(December 2023).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103921
Deputi Bidang Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian BKN. (2023). Buku Statistik Aparatur Sipil Negara Semester 1.
ESRC. (2009). Seminar Series Mapping the public policy landscape. Seminar Series Mapping the public policy
landscape, Human behaviours to moving people more intelligently, 1–52.
Fujii, S., & Taniguchi, A. (2006). Determinants of the effectiveness of travel feedback programs-a review of
communicative mobility management measures for changing travel behaviour in Japan. Transport Policy,
13(5), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.007
Geng, J., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2016). Impact of information intervention on travel mode choice of urban residents
with different goal frames: A controlled trial in Xuzhou, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and
Practice, 91, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.031
Henderson, L. W., Knight, T., & Richardson, B. (2013). An exploration of the well-being benefits of hedonic and
eudaimonic behaviour. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 322–336.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.803596
Howell, R. A. (2014). Investigating the Long-Term Impacts of Climate Change Communications on Individuals’
Attitudes and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70–101.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512452428
Kim, J. (2013). Strategies for Increasing the Acceptability of Sustainable Transport Policies. Kyoto University.
Liu, D., Du, H., Southworth, F., & Ma, S. (2017). The influence of social-psychological factors on the intention to
choose low-carbon travel modes in Tianjin, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,
105(August), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.004
Madow, W. G. (1968). Elementary Sampling Theory. Technometrics, 10(3), 621–622.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1968.10490610
McMakin, A. H., & Malone, E. L. (2002). Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives.
Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 848–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237252
Skarin, F., Olsson, L. E., Friman, M., & Wästlund, E. (2019). Importance of motives, self-efficacy, social support
and satisfaction with travel for behavior change during travel intervention programs. Transportation Research
Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.002